Why a Home Is Not a Retirement Plan

Your Home Isn’t Your Retirement Plan

According to Axio, in 2023, 37% of Americans in 2005 used their home equity to help fund their retirement. In 2019, it was 73%. Is that a good thing? Is it sustainable?

A retirement plan in need of a solution

In just over a decade, home equity utilization as a retirement funding tool in the United States skyrocketed from 37% to a staggering 73%. This remarkable surge raises critical questions: Is this trend beneficial? Can it be sustained? Delving into these inquiries unveils the profound implications of relying on home equity for retirement security.

The exponential growth in home equity utilization signifies a profound shift in how Americans approach retirement planning. While leveraging home equity offers immediate financial relief and the allure of a comfortable retirement, its sustainability remains uncertain. This surge may symbolize systemic issues such as stagnant wages, rising living costs, and inadequate retirement savings.

Scrutinizing the long-term viability of this trend is imperative. While it may alleviate immediate financial burdens, over-reliance on home equity poses significant risks. Economic fluctuations, housing market volatility, and unforeseen circumstances could jeopardize retirement security for millions.

Moreover, the broader socioeconomic implications warrant consideration. A society where many retirees rely on home equity for financial stability underscores systemic inequalities and the erosion of traditional retirement frameworks.

The surge in utilizing home equity for retirement demands a nuanced evaluation. It prompts reflection on the evolving landscape of retirement planning, the resilience of financial systems, and the pursuit of equitable socioeconomic structures. As we navigate these complexities, ensuring that retirement security remains a tangible and sustainable reality for all Americans becomes increasingly vital.

Real Estate and Your Retirement Plan

A familiar refrain of mine, “A home is not a retirement plan,” recently sparked a dialogue that I sincerely appreciate. Engaging with comments invariably ignites thought and reflection. One participant argued that a home can indeed play a role in retirement planning, citing examples of individuals in the Northeast who downsize to more affordable properties in the South, often purchasing outright and pocketing the surplus. Another commenter emphasized the appeal of owning a residence outright in retirement rather than facing rental expenses.

While I acknowledge the validity of these perspectives in principle, the reality unfolding across America tells a different story. A sobering analysis from the New York Times in June 2013, based on a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau report, revealed that a staggering “30 percent of all homeowners aged 70 and older are burdened with mortgage debt.” This starkly contrasts with findings from a 2001 Survey of Consumer Finances by The Federal Reserve, which reported that only 8 percent of homeowners aged 75 or older carried such debt. This troubling trend is on the rise.

My concern deepens when I observe that many Americans perceive their homes solely as retirement assets without aligning their mortgage management strategies accordingly. Data from Credit Sesame between 2001 and 2008 showed that homeowners typically remained in their properties for about six years. By 2007, during the housing market’s peak, only 27.6 percent of Americans remained in their homes for a decade, and just over half stayed for two decades. However, the aftermath of the housing crisis in 2008 brought significant shifts. The most recent study by the National Association of Home Buyers, using data up to 2011, suggests that buyers anticipate staying in their homes for around 13 years. Even with conservative projections considering recent anomalies, the estimate still hovers at 16 years.

Compounding this issue is the enduring prevalence of the conventional 30-year fixed mortgage. This indicates that many buyers either trade up to newer properties before paying off their existing loans or accelerate their mortgage repayment timeline. Until the mortgage is settled, homeowners remain beholden to their lenders, rendering the home a liability rather than an asset in our eyes.

In essence, while homeownership undoubtedly holds potential benefits for retirement, the mismatch between perception and financial reality underscores the need for prudent mortgage management and a holistic approach to retirement planning. Until a home is wholly owned, it remains a monetary obligation, subjecting individuals to the uncertainties of mortgage debt.

Your Home as a Liability

Scott Shellady, a senior vice president of derivatives for Trean Group, a futures and commodities exchange in Chicago, recently made a striking statement that suggests the traditional view of a home as a lucrative investment may be outdated.

We concur with Shellady’s perspective, advocating for a recalibration in how Americans integrate their homes into their financial portfolios. Classifying the entire value of one’s home as an investment lacks accuracy unless the mortgage is entirely paid off. Similarly, including home equity in one’s net worth is misleading without full ownership or sufficient liquid assets to cover the outstanding mortgage balance, rendering the home a liability.

To illustrate, let’s consider a scenario: We purchased our condo for $130,000, and let’s assume it’s now valued at $150,000. However, with a remaining mortgage balance of $120,000, our equity is $30,000. Despite the apparent increase in property value, neither the $150,000 home value nor the $30,000 equity can be counted in our net worth, as we’re still liable for the $120,000 debt.

$150,000 Current Home Value – $237,000 Remaining Expense = – $87,000 Liability

Further analysis reveals the impact of a mortgage on long-term finances. With 22 years of payments remaining, we anticipate paying $324,000 over the loan’s lifespan. Accounting for the remaining costs, approximately $237,000, we face a potential liability of $87,000. This assessment acknowledges the inherent uncertainties in property appreciation, as evidenced by the market volatility experienced in 2008.

By scrutinizing the implications of a home loan on net worth, it becomes evident why we advocate for purchasing a property that aligns with one’s financial capacity. Reflecting on past experiences, such as the real estate agent’s attempt to sell us a $950,000 house, reinforces the importance of prudent decision-making in real estate transactions. Our financial situation could have been significantly compromised if we succumbed to that temptation.

Your Home as an Investment

If you’re inclined to view your home as an investment, it’s entirely plausible, but adopting a long-term perspective is crucial. Investing in a home should align with your commitment to stability and foresight. If your living situation is uncertain within the next five years, holding off on homeownership is prudent. Likewise, relying on specialized loans to afford your dream home may signify overextending yourself financially.

The key to prudent homeownership lies in purchasing within or below your means, securing a fixed-rate mortgage, and diligently paying it off over time or before schedule. Avoid treating your home’s equity as an easy source of funds and instead prioritize regular maintenance and reasonable upgrades. Beware of the allure of upgrading or upsizing prematurely, as this can strain your finances and delay the realization of your home’s actual value as an asset.

For many, the journey to financial security and fulfillment involves making intentional choices. Choosing a home that fits our needs has allowed us to maintain a comfortable lifestyle without sacrificing our long-term goals. While we may admire larger, more luxurious homes, we prioritize financial stability and personal fulfillment.

Ultimately, we must chart our course and define success on our terms. Our unique aspirations and circumstances should guide financial decisions, not societal expectations or peer pressure. Whether you envision a bustling household or a serene retreat, it’s essential to acknowledge the trade-offs inherent in pursuing your dreams and to remain steadfast in prioritizing what truly matters to you.

As we strive towards our ideal retirement, let’s not allow our homes to derail our aspirations. Instead, let’s approach homeownership as one aspect of our broader life goals, ensuring that it complements rather than detracts from our dreams.

A conclusion for why a home isn’t a retirement plan

In conclusion, while viewing a home’s equity as a reliable retirement plan is tempting, the reality often falls short of this ideal. Relying solely on home equity overlooks the complexities and uncertainties of the real estate market and mortgage dynamics. The 2008 housing crisis is a stark reminder of the risks of placing all our retirement hopes in appreciating property values.

A home should be treasured for its emotional and practical value, but it’s essential to approach it with realistic expectations. Instead of banking solely on home equity, diversifying retirement savings across various investment vehicles can provide more excellent stability and security in the long run.

Ultimately, a robust retirement plan encompasses a range of strategies tailored to individual circumstances and goals. By acknowledging the limitations of relying on home equity alone, we can make more informed decisions and better safeguard our financial future.

Other retirement resources for you: